رابطه بین ظرفیت حافظه کاری و توانایی تصویر سازی حرکتی بین افراد جوان و سالمند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی-رشد حرکتی گروه علوم ورزشی دانشکده روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز ایران

2 گروه علوم ورزشی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 گروه علوم ورزشی دانشکده روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز ایران

چکیده

هدف
امروزه مهارت‌های روانی یک عامل مهم در پیشبرد سلامت افراد جامعه محسوب می‌شود، این مؤلفه برای گروه سالمندان ضرورت بیشتری دارد. هدف از تحقیق حاضر، بررسی رابطه تصویرسازی‌حرکتی و ظرفیت حافظه‌کاری جوانان و سالمندان بود. جامعه آماری تحقیق، سالمندان شهر شیراز و دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز بود.
روش پژوهش
نمونه پژوهش شامل40 نفر (20 سالمند و20جوان) بود. برای سنجش حافظه‌کاری از آزمون اِن‌بک، و برای بررسی توانایی تصویرسازی حرکتی از پرسشنامه تصویرسازی‌حرکتی استفاده شد. از مؤلفه‌های آزمون حافظه کاری اِن‌بک، هم برای جوانان و هم برای سالمندان چهار مولفه: تعدادپاسخ‌های صحیح، درصد پاسخ‌های صحیح، انحراف استاندارد زمان پاسخ و میانگین زمان پاسخ انتخاب شدند و با مؤلفه‌های تصویرسازی‌بینایی و حرکتی جوانان و سالمندان بررسی شد، همچنین مؤلفه‌های حافظه‌کاری و تصویرسازی در جوانان و سالمندان مقایسه شدند.
یافته‌ها
در گروه جوانان، تصویر‌سازی‌حرکتی با مؤلفه­های انحراف‌استاندارد زمان‌پاسخ و میانگین زمان‌پاسخ، همبستگی معکوس داشت، ولی در گروه سالمندان توانایی تصویرسازی حرکتی با مؤلفه­های تعداد پاسخ­های‌درست، درصد پاسخ­های درست و میانگین زمان پاسخ همبستگی مثبت داشت. اما توانایی تصویرسازی بینایی در افراد جوان با هیچکدام از مؤلفه‌های حافظه‌کاری ارتباط معنادار نداشت و توانایی تصویرسازی‌بینایی در آزمودنی‌های سالمند با درصد پاسخ‌صحیح همبستگی منفی داشت.
نتیجه گیری
نتایج پژوهش نشان داد در گروه جوانان، تصویر‌سازی با مؤلفه‌های زمانی همبستگی داشت ولی با مؤلفه‌های دقت نداشت که به‌این معنی است که افراد جوان روی سرعت تاکید داشتند ولی سالمندان روی دقت تاکید داشتند. توانایی تصویر‌سازی‌بینایی در آزمودنی‌های سالمند و جوان همبستگی کمی با مؤلفه‌های حافظه‌کاری داشت، دلیل احتمالی این موضوع این است که آن‌ها بیشتر از حس جنبشی خود در ایجاد تصاویر‌حرکتی در ذهن استفاده می‌کنند چراکه هم اطمینان بیشتری را فراهم می‌کند و هم موجب یادگیری مهارت از طریق تصویر‌سازی می‌شود. به طور کلی یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که جوانان در تمام مؤلفه‌های حافظه کاری نسبت به افراد سالمند تفاوت معنی‌داری دارند. این یافته با یافته‌های پژوهشی‌های قبلی که نشان می‌دهد فرایند سالمندی موجب کاهش عملکردهای شناختی می‌شود همراستا می‌باشد

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between working memory capacity and motor imagery ability between young and elderly people

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Abdoli masinan 1
  • Davoud Fazeli 2
  • Gholam Hosein Nazemzadegan 3
1 Department of Sport Science faculty of education psychology university of Shiraz iran
2 Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shiraz< Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Sport Science faculty of education psychology university of Shiraz iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: Nowadays, mental skills are an important factor in improving the health of people in the society, this component is more necessary for the elderly group. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between motor imagery and working memory capacity of young people and the elderly. The statistical population of the research was the elderly of Shiraz city and the students of Shiraz University.
Method: The research sample included 40 people (20 elderly and 20 young). N-back test was used to measure working memory, and motor imagery questionnaire was used to check motor imagery ability. From the working memory test components, four components were selected for both the young and the elderly: the number of correct answers, the percentage of correct answers, the standard deviation of the response time, and the average response time, and were examined with visual and motor imagery components of the young and the elderly. Also, the components of working memory and imagery were compared in the young and the elderly.
Results: In the youth group, motor imagery had an inverse correlation with the components: standard deviation of response time and average response time, but in the elderly group, motor imagery ability had a positive correlation with the components: number of correct answers, percentage of correct answers, and average response time. But visual imagery ability in young people had no significant relationship with any of the working memory skills, and visual imagery ability in the elderly only had a negative correlation with the percentage of correct answers.
Conclusions: The results of this research showed that in the youth group, motor imagery was correlated with time components, but not with accuracy components. which means that young people emphasized speed, but the elderly group emphasized accuracy. In addition, visual imagery ability in the elderly and young people had little correlation with working memory components. Probably the reason for this is that they use more of their kinetic sense in creating moving images in the mind, because firstly it provides more confidence and secondly it causes learning skills through visualization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Imagery
  • Motor Imagery
  • Working Memory
  • Elderly

Introduction

sports psychologists consider mental skills as an important factor in the progress and success of athletes [1]. Acquisition of new motor skills are very important issues in life from childhood to old age. Memory is one of the most important great abilities of the brain in all humans, which is known as a person's ability to remember and recall. One type of memory is working memory, which is known for comparing short term information with information stored in long term memory [3]. Research has shown that people who have a higher working memory capacity have better cognitive performance than people whose working memory capacity is lower [4]. With increasing age, during the physiological processes of old age, the function of some parts of the brain deteriorate, and old age is associated with a decrease in cognitive function as well as working memory [8]. A component that can be related to working memory is motor imagery. Motor imagery is the mental representation of an action without engaging in its actual execution. Lower-intensity motor imagery activates neural networks that control the preparation of the actual movement and the execution of the corresponding action. Since imagery is a completely internal process and is considered based on cognitive processes, or more clearly a top-down process [16], it is possible that there is a connection between motor imagery and working memory. This is while it has been shown that imaging ability decreases with aging [17]. Neurophysiological techniques have shown that the cortical and subcortical regions of the brain, which play the role of planning and controlling movement, start their activity during mental training. Therefore, in this research, we investigated the relationship between motor imagery and working memory capacity of young people and the elderly.

 

Method: The research method of the current research was correlational. The variables measured in this research were working memory ability (number of correct answers, percentage of correct answers, standard deviation of response time and average response time) and imaging ability (motor imagery and visual imagery) in young and elderly people. The research sample consisted of 40 people (20 elderly people with an average age of 68.59±5.78 years and 20 young people with an average age of 27.53±3.58 years). N-back test was used to measure the working memory of young people and the elderly. Also, in order to check the motor imagery ability of young people and the elderly, the Motor imagery questionnaire was used. In the statistical analysis of the research, before testing the hypotheses, the normality of the data in young people was examined through the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the results of this test showed that the imaging information and working memory information do not have a normal distribution (P<0.05). For this reason, Spearman's test was used to investigate the relationship between visualization variables and working memory. Also, for the data of elderly people, the results of the Shapiro-Wilk test showed that only the information related to the average response time did not have a normal distribution (P<0.05), and the rest of the information had a normal distribution (P<0.05). Non-parametric Spearman correlation was used to measure the correlation of imaging information with average response time index, but Pearson correlation was used in other cases. In addition, the non-parametric equivalent of the independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U) was used to compare the data of young and elderly people.

    It should be noted that in all tests, a significance level of 0.05 was considered and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 software.

 

Results: The results showed that in the youth group, movement imagery had a significant and inverse correlation with components of average response time (ρ=-0.50, P=0.029, N=19) and standard deviation of response time (ρ=-0.48, 0.038 (P=19, N=19). But there was no significant correlation with the components of the number of correct answers (ρ=-0.25, P=0.3, N=19) and percentage of correct answers (ρ=-0.26, P=0.27, N=19) (P<0.05). The results also showed that, in this group, visual imagery ability has no significant correlation with: number of correct answers (ρ=0.11, P=0.065, N=19), percentage of correct answers (ρ=0.12, P=0.60, N=19), average response time (ρ=0.32, P=0.18, N=19) and standard deviation of response time (ρ=0.43, P=0.066, N=19). (P<0.05). But the results showed that in the elderly group, motor imagery ability had a positive and significant correlation with the components: number of correct answers (r=0.53, P=0.026, N=17), percentage of correct answers (r=0.66, P=0.004, N=17) and average response time (ρ=0.525, P=0.03, N=17), and there was no significant correlation with the component of standard deviation of response time (r=0.12, P=0.63, N=17). In visual imaging ability, this group only has a positive and significant correlation with the percentage of correct answers (r=0.62, P=0.008, N=17), and there is no significant correlation with the other components, all (P<0.05). Also, the results of comparing young and elderly people showed that the scores of visual imageries, motor imagery, the number of correct answers, the percentage of correct answers, the average response time, and the standard deviation of the response time of young people are higher than the elderly people.

 

Conclusion: The findings of this research showed that young people have significant differences in all components of working memory compared to elderly people. It is possible that the decrease in cognitive function has a neural basis, which is strengthened in old age by the increase in neuronal death. Therefore, it is possible that with the reduction of the brain capacity of the elderly, they will experience a decrease in cognitive abilities, which can affect the working memory abilities of the elderly. Research has shown that this decline in cognitive abilities is partly due to lack of motor activity in old age. If the person increases his activity, it is possible that the decrease in cognitive abilities will be compensated to some extent [27,28]. This shows that working memory is related to movement ability. Also, in this research, it was shown that elderly people have less visual and motor imagery ability compared to young people. This result is in line with previous findings that show a decrease in motor and visual imagery capabilities in the elderly [17]. The remarkable finding in this research was that there was a significant and inverse correlation between the motor imagery ability of young people who used their kinesthetic sense and the components: average response time and standard deviation of response time. Also, in the young participants, an inverse correlation has been observed between the motor imagery ability and the time components of working memory. This issue clearly shows that young people put the most emphasis on providing the answer in the shortest time while performing a task. Also, in this group, it was observed that visual imagery ability has little relationship with working memory ability. This emphasizes that young people use their kinesthetic sense more to create moving images in the mind, because it provides more confidence to people and it has also been shown that it can better learn skills through motor imagery [16]. On the contrary of young people, it was observed among the elderly that there was a direct and significant correlation between the ability to imagine movement and the following components: the number of correct answers, the percentage of correct answers, and the average response time. That is, with the increase in the scores of motor imagery, these cases increased. In addition, it was shown that the ability to visual imagery in the elderly has a positive and significant correlation with the percentage of correct answers. All these findings show that elderly people emphasize accuracy in solving problems related to working memory.

 

Keywords: Motor imagery, working memory, elderly, young, imagery.

 

Ethical Considerations

 

Compliance with ethical guidelines

The ethical principles observed in the article, such as the informed consent of the participants, the confidentiality of information, the permission of the participants to cancel their participation in the research. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Shiraz.

 

Funding

This study was extracted from the MSc thesis of Alireza Abdoli Masinan at Department of Motor Behavior of Shiraz University.

 

Authors' contribution

All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants of the present study.

  1. Hall EG, Erffmeyer ES. The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotaped modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players. Journal of sport psychology. 1983. https://orcid.org/10.1123/jsp.5.3.343
  2. Eskandarnejad M, Rezaei F. The effect of aerobic exercise on neural networks of attention and working memory. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2018 Apr 10;6(2):31-40. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.29252/shefa.6.2.31
  3. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Shah P, Miyake A. Models of working memory. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. 1999:1-27. https://orcid.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.004
  5. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual review of psychology. 2013 Jan 3; 64:135-68. https://orcid.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  6. Nazarboland, N., Azadfallah, P., Fathi Ashtiani, A., & Ashayeri, H. (2011). Frontal cortical arousal during working memory performance in trait‎ https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.004
  7. Shabani F, Esmaeili A, Salman Z. Effectiveness of Different Intensities of Acute Resistance Exercise on Working Memory of the Elderly. Aging Psychology. 2017 May 22;3(1):55-67. (In Persian).
  8. Brehmer Y, Rieckmann A, Bellander M, Westerberg H, Fischer H, Bäckman L. Neural correlates of training-related working-memory gains in old age. Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 15;58(4):1110-20. https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.07
  9. Soleimanvandi Azar N, Mohaqeqi Kamal SH, Sajadi H, Ghaedamini Harouni GR, Karimi S, Foroozan AS. Barriers and facilitators of the outpatient health service use by the elderly. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2020 Oct 10;15(3):258-77. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.32598/sija.15.3.551.3
  10. Saeidi Borujeni M, Hosseini SA, Akbarfahimi N, Vahedi M, Ebrahimi E. Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance Approach in Iranian Elderly Without Cognitive Impairment: A Single-Subject Study. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2020 Dec 10;21(4):526-43. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.32598/RJ.21.4.3156.1
  11. Peymannia B, Bitarafan L, Hosseini A. Evaluation and comparison of executive functions and false memory in the elderly. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 10;6(5):108-17. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.29252/shenakht.6.5.108
  12. Yazdanbakhsh K, Jashenpour M, Sanjabi A, Abbariki A. Dimensions of memory in elderly compared with non-elderly. Aging Psychology. 2019 Feb 20;4(4):275-82. (In Persian).
  13. Kanthack TF, Guillot A, Blache Y, Di Rienzo F. Revisiting the acute effects of resistance exercise on motor imagery ability. Behavioural Brain Research. 2021 Aug 27; 412:113441. https://orcid.org/ 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113441
  14. Post PG, Wrisberg CA, Mullins S. A field test of the influence of pre-game imagery on basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity. 2010 Jan 25;5(1). https://orcid.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1042
  15. Holmes P, Calmels C. A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. Journal of motor behavior. 2008 Sep 1;40(5):433-45. https://orcid.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.5.433-445
  16. Schott N. Age-related differences in motor imagery: Working memory as a mediator. Experimental Aging Research. 2012 Oct 1;38(5):559-83. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2012.726045
  17. Najarzadegan M, Nejati V, Amiri N, Sharifian M. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on executive function (working memory and attention) in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Rehab Med. 2015 Jun 22;4(2):97-108. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.22037/jrm.2015.1100031
  18. Sohrabi M, Farsi A, Foladian J. Determining the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the revised movement imaging questionnaire. Mot. Behav. 2010; 2:13-24 (In Persian). https://orcid.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.078725.185
  19. Harada CN, Love MC, Triebel KL. Normal cognitive aging. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2013 Nov 1;29(4):737-52. https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002
  20. Bopp KL, Verhaeghen P. Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2005 Sep 1;60(5): P223-33. https://orcid.org/10.1093/geronb/60.5. p223
  21. Bopp KL, Verhaeghen P. Working memory and aging: separating the effects of content and context. Psychology and aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):968. Doi: 10.1037/a0017731
  22. Bopp KL, Verhaeghen P. Aging and n-back performance: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2020 Jan 14;75(2):229-40. https://orcid.org/10.1093/geronb/gby024
  23. Verhaeghen P, Geigerman S, Yang H, Montoya AC, Rahnev D. Resolving age-related differences in working memory: Equating perception and attention makes older adults remember as well as younger adults. Experimental aging research. 2019 Mar 15;45(2):120-34. https://orcid.org/10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586120
  24. Bishop NA, Lu T, Yankner BA. Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):529-35. https://orcid.org/10.1038/nature08983
  25. Zhidong C, Wang X, Yin J, Song D, Chen Z. Effects of physical exercise on working memory in older adults: a systematic and meta-analytic review. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity. 2021 Dec;18(1):1-5. https://orcid.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00272-y
  26. Zhao C, Zhao C, Zhao M, Wang L, Guo J, Zhang L, Li Y, Sun Y, Zhang L, Li ZA, Zhu W. Effect of Exergame Training on Working Memory and Executive Function in Older Adults. Sustainability. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):10631. https://orcid.org/10.3390/su141710631
  27. Buszard T, Farrow D, Verswijveren SJ, Reid M, Williams J, Polman R, Ling FC, Masters RS. Working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions. Frontiers in psychology. 2017 Aug 22; 8:1350. https://orcid.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350
  28. Mulder TH, Hochstenbach JB, Van Heuvelen MJ, Den Otter AR. Motor imagery: the relation between age and imagery capacity. Human movement science. 2007 Apr 1;26(2):203-11. https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.001
  29. Skoura X, Papaxanthis C, Vinter A, Pozzo T. Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging: I. Age effects on the temporal features of overt and covert execution of actions. Behavioural brain research. 2005 Dec 7;165(2):229-39. https://orcid.org/1016/j.bbr.2005.07.023
  30. Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain research reviews. 2009 May 1;60(2):306-26. https://orcid.org/1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024
  31. Fazeli D, Rostami R, Nazemzadegan G. Effect of Motor Imagery and Action Observation on Mental Representation and Movement Accuracy of Basketball free Throw. Sport Psychology Studies (ie, mutaleat ravanshenasi varzeshi). 2022 Feb 20;10(38):23-42. (In Persian). https://orcid.org/22089/spsyj.2021.9948.2091
  32. Rapport LJ, Webster JS, Dutra RL. Digit span performance and unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1994 May 1;32(5):517-25. https://orcid.org/1016/0028-3932(94)90141-4
  33. Lequerica A, Rapport L, Axelrod BN, Telmet K, Whitman RD. Subjective and objective assessment methods of mental imagery control: Construct validations of self-report measures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2002 Dec 1;24(8):1103-16. https://orcid.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1103.8370
  34. Walsh WD, Russell DG, Imanaka K. Memory for movement: Interaction of location and distance cues and imagery ability. Acta psychologica. 1980 Mar 1;44(2):117-30. https://orcid.org/1016/0001-6918(80)90062-1