<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه قم</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مطالعات عملکردی در روانشناسی ورزشی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3060-8023</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Comparative Analysis of Personality Traits of Elite Iranian Chess Coaches and Referees Based on the Five-Factor Model of Personality</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تحلیل مقایسه‌ای ویژگی‌های شخصیتی مربیان و داوران نخبه شطرنج ایران بر اساس مدل پنج‌عاملی شخصیت</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4339</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/frs.2026.14720.1133</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حسین</FirstName>
					<LastName>سلطانی</LastName>
<Affiliation>1- گروه روان‌شناسی ورزشی، واحد تربت‌حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت‌حیدریه، ایران. 
2- مرکز تحقیقات طب ورزشی، واحد تربت حیدریه،</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-3985-2385</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>طوبی</FirstName>
					<LastName>حسن نژاد سلامی</LastName>
<Affiliation>گروه روان‌شناسی ورزشی، واحد تربت‌حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت‌حیدریه، ایران.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0005-5710-2176</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Objectives: This study aimed to compare the personality traits of elite Iranian chess coaches and referees based on the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Given the cognitively demanding nature of chess and the influential roles of coaches and referees, understanding potential personality differences can support more informed selection, training, and professional development.&lt;br /&gt;Methods &amp; Materials: A descriptive–comparative survey design was employed. The statistical population included all elite chess coaches and referees in Iran in 2024. A total of 133 participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected electronically using Goldberg’s 50-item Big Five Personality Inventory. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test assessed data normality. One-way ANOVA was used for normally distributed variables, while the Kruskal–Walli’s test was applied for non-normal variables. Analyses were conducted using SPSS 26 with a significance level of p &lt; 0.05.&lt;br /&gt;Results: No significant differences were observed between coaches and referees in Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, or Openness to Experience (p &gt; 0.05). However, referees demonstrated significantly higher Emotional Stability (p &lt; 0.05), indicating greater capacity for emotional regulation, composure, and stress tolerance under competitive pressure.&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: The findings indicate a high degree of similarity between the two groups across most personality domains, with Emotional Stability emerging as the primary distinguishing trait. This result underscores the specific psychological demands associated with officiating in chess and emphasizes the importance of emotional regulation in effectively performing the referee role at elite levels.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Objectives: This study aimed to compare the personality traits of elite Iranian chess coaches and referees based on the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Given the cognitively demanding nature of chess and the influential roles of coaches and referees, understanding potential personality differences can support more informed selection, training, and professional development.&lt;br /&gt;Methods &amp; Materials: A descriptive–comparative survey design was employed. The statistical population included all elite chess coaches and referees in Iran in 2024. A total of 133 participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected electronically using Goldberg’s 50-item Big Five Personality Inventory. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test assessed data normality. One-way ANOVA was used for normally distributed variables, while the Kruskal–Walli’s test was applied for non-normal variables. Analyses were conducted using SPSS 26 with a significance level of p &lt; 0.05.&lt;br /&gt;Results: No significant differences were observed between coaches and referees in Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, or Openness to Experience (p &gt; 0.05). However, referees demonstrated significantly higher Emotional Stability (p &lt; 0.05), indicating greater capacity for emotional regulation, composure, and stress tolerance under competitive pressure.&lt;br /&gt;Conclusions: The findings indicate a high degree of similarity between the two groups across most personality domains, with Emotional Stability emerging as the primary distinguishing trait. This result underscores the specific psychological demands associated with officiating in chess and emphasizes the importance of emotional regulation in effectively performing the referee role at elite levels.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Chess</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Personality Traits</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Five-Factor Model</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Coaches &amp; Referees</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
